@ARTICLE\{IMM2011-06209,
    author       = "H. Aan{\ae}s and A. L. Dahl and K. S. Pedersen",
    title        = "Interesting Interest Points - A Comparative Study of Interest Point Performance on a Unique Data Set",
    year         = "2011",
    month        = "jun",
    keywords     = "Benchmark data set, Interest point detectors, Performance evaluation, Object recognition, Scene matching",
    journal      = "International Journal of Computer Vision",
    volume       = "",
    editor       = "",
    number       = "",
    publisher    = "",
    note         = "DOI: 10.1007/s11263-011-0473-8",
    url          = "http://www.springerlink.com/content/e315081774457204/",
    abstract     = "Not all interest points are equally interesting. The most valuable interest points lead to optimal performance of the computer vision method in which they are employed, but a measure of this kind will be dependent on the chosen vision application. We propose a more general performance measure based on spatial invariance of interest points under changing acquisition parameters by measuring the spatial recall rate. The scope of this paper is to investigate the performance of a number of existing well-established interest point detection methods. Automatic performance evaluation of interest points is hard because the true correspondence is generally unknown. We overcome this by providing an extensive data set with known spatial correspondence. The data is acquired with a camera mounted on a {6-}axis industrial robot providing very accurate camera positioning. Furthermore the scene is scanned with a structured light scanner resulting in precise {3D} surface information. In total 60 scenes are depicted ranging from model houses, building material, fruit and vegetables, fabric, printed media and more. Each scene is depicted from 119 camera positions and 19 individual {LED} illuminations are used for each position. The {LED} illumination provides the option for artificially relighting the scene from a range of light directions. This data set has given us the ability to systematically evaluate the performance of a number of interest point detectors. The highlights of the conclusions are that the fixed scale Harris corner detector performs overall best followed by the Hessian based detectors and the difference of Gaussian (DoG). The methods based on scale space features have an overall better performance than other methods especially when varying the distance to the scene, where especially {FAST} corner detector, Edge Based Regions (EBR) and Intensity Based Regions (IBR) have a poor performance. The performance of Maximally Stable Extremal Regions (MSER) is moderate. We observe a relatively large decline in performance with both change in viewpoint  and light direction."
}